David and Lynn Angell: Their Final Domicile Pt3

This article was originally posted on Let's Roll and follows on from my earlier post on the same topic, which can be found @ http://firemansams.blogspot.com/2010/11/david-and-lynn-angell-their-final.html. The original version of this article can be found @ http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php?p=191640&postcount=74

Following on from my last post about the hijack lawsuit brought by David Angell's relatives, here's more damning evidence against the arguments made in this case as regards the couple's domicile at the time of their deaths. To recap, the lawyers argued that the couple had sold their home in California AND their existing property on Cape Cod.

"The couple had sold their long-held summer home on Cape Cod, and their new Cape Cod vacation home was still under construction, the plaintiffs’ lawyers said."

However, property deeds available on the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds website indicate that the couple's property on Cape Cod, 21 Shattuck Lane, Chatham was not sold until after their alleged deaths. This property was sold in March 2002 by Perry Oretzky, acting in his capacity as executor of the couple's wills.

So, on the one hand we have David's brother, Kenneth Angell, telling us that David and Lynn had hosted a family wedding at their home on Cape Cod just prior to 9/11, and on the other we have the same Kenneth Angell involved in a lawsuit alleging that the couple had sold their Cape Cod home and were residing in a non-existent property on a non-existent street in Providence, Rhode Island!

Is there anything to this beyond the rather obvious money-grubbing, given that there was a strong financial incentive for 'proving' that the couple were residents of Rhode Island, rather than California or Massachusetts? The projo.com article has this to say:

"Under California and Massachusetts law, “recovery is largely limited to economic loss to dependants” and Angell had no children. Under Rhode Island law, damages would be calculated by projecting Angell’s lifetime earnings, minus lifetime expenses, defense lawyers said."

One can only wonder at the standard of 'evidence' accepted by the court in question, given that the below documents were not exactly difficult to come by and demonstrate that there is something very, very wrong here.

David Receives a Doctorate, Revisited

This article was originally posted on Let's Roll and is reproduced here for the purpose of keeping my blog up-to-date and active. The original can be found @ http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php?p=189475&postcount=13.

I've reviewed the "David receives his honorary doctorate" image and identified other issues with it, consistent with it also being another genuine picture of David Angell that has been altered in order to change his appearance. Just as his Emmy Award picture matches the 1984 Emmy Award video, this image tallies with David's biography and his being awarded an honorary doctorate by his alma mater, Providence College, in 1994.

The fact that the Angell Foundation appears to be altering genuine pictures of David suggests that David Angell is still alive: by placing false pictures of David into the public domain the Foundation is obviously playing its part to ensure that David goes unrecognised under whatever name he now uses. Why else would the Foundation seek to mislead us, given that we know that David Angell was a real person rather than an outright 'vicsim'?

In my view, it seems reasonable to assume that the alterations being made to these images are relatively subtle. In saying this, I'm referring not to the quality of the alterations per se (some are truly awful) but to the new facial characteristics themselves. If these alterations were too drastic they might arouse suspicion among those who knew him in real life. As things stand, one assumes that former friends and colleagues have no reason to scour the internet for pictures of their supposedly deceased friend and colleague; no doubt they have plenty of their own. Still, erring on the side of caution, it would be better to produce images that resemble David - on a bad day - rather than images that look nothing at all like him.

The alternative is that these images have been manipulated to such an extent that they no longer bear any resemblance to the real David Angell. However, this would suggest that a multitude of friends, colleagues, and other Hollywood insiders are fully aware of, and playing along with, the deception. In this context, a cloud of suspicion hangs over Stephen Rollins, for the reasons stated in my previous post, and Ken Levine, who issues an annual tribute to David and Lynn that contains the below image.

Peter Casey and David Lee, who occasionally pop up on Levine's blog, would also have to be added to the list in my opinion. While we're about it, we might as well add the rest of the cast and crew of Cheers, Wings and Frasier to the list, too. Others, such as Colleen Dunn Bates, may be nothing more than hacks willing to invent a story or two in return for an envelope stuffed with cash. However, is this scenario plausible? Surely an operation of this nature would have been organised on a strict need-to-know basis?

Regardless of the scenario, The Angell Foundation's president, Perry Oretzky, would have to be fully aware: as Angell's friend and CPA it seems likely he would have had a role in making financial and other preparations. Even if he didn't, it's literally inconceivable to think that someone who had a personal and working relationship with David Angell could fail to notice the visual discrepancies that appear in his own organisation's brochures and website.

In the final analysis, who knows would depend on the reason for his disappearance, who arranged it and for what purpose. Was this an opportunist act on his part, a calculated decision to take advantage of the Flight 11 scenario and disappear for reasons entirely his own? If so, is this in any way linked to the financial irregularities surrounding Frasier? Or - and this has to be entertained given his active involvement with children's charities - to the child abuse scandal and cover up involving his brother, Kenneth Angell? Regardless, how could he have arranged his disappearance without foreknowledge of Flight 11's involvement in the 9/11 operation? I'm assuming, of course, that he actually had a choice in the matter, which may not be the case.

There's lots of speculation here I know, but all the evidence appears to be pointing in the same direction. The bottom line is that I can think of no other good reason why the Foundation has altered these pictures in this way. Why didn't he elect to undergo plastic surgery and leave the photographic record untouched? Was this deemed too drastic a step, given that his face was relatively unknown prior to 9/11? The irony here is that with the exception of his 1984 and 1999 video appearances, his face only really entered the public domain in the aftermath of 9/11, following the release of these altered pictures to media outlets.

David L. Angell: Images The Angell Foundation Doesn't Want You To See

Introduction

To the very best of my knowledge the following set of pictures of David L. Angell, supposed writer/producer of Cheers and Frasier and alleged passenger on American Airlines Flight 11, have never been released to the public or posted elsewhere - with one exception (see below). To date, the only images of David and Lynn available in the public domain are the identical ‘stock photos’ found on Wikipedia and various 9/11 memorial sites. Consequently, I firmly believe that these new images are important new evidence, evidence which supports the contention that, like other alleged ‘victims’ of 9/11, David L. Angell and his wife, Lynn E. Angell, never existed in the sense that you and I exist. In other words, that David and Lynn Angell are fabrications or ‘vicsims’.

I originally posted these images on the September Clues "Reality Shack" forum on October 7 2010. Within minutes of posting I received a reply from forum administrator simonshack, demanding that I provide the source of the images. Being unwilling to post the source publicly, I sent this information to simonshack in the form of a private message. Thirty minutes later I discovered that my post AND my account had been deleted. No explanation was offered and two subsequent requests for an explanation, in the form of emails to the forum’s second administrator, hoi.polloi, went unanswered.

I will leave you, the reader, to draw your own conclusions as to the reason why simonshack and hoi.polloi do not want members of their Reality Shack forum to see these important images.

The Source

In light of the above I now consider the source of these images to be compromised and thus likely to be 'locked out' at any time. Accordingly, I'm happy to make the source publicly available. The source is in fact The Angell Foundation, a charitable trust that controls the Angell's alleged $55 million estate and represents (or misrepresents, according to your point of view) them in this life. When viewing these images it's worth remembering that David's sister, Claire, and Lynn's brother, Thomas, are listed as members of the Foundation's Advisory Committee. It seems reasonable to assume that Claire and Thomas must have access to a whole host of quality images of David and Lynn, a point that makes the extremely dubious nature of these images (particularly the very obviously 'Photoshopped' image that appears on the Foundation's official brochure) even more salient, not to mention damning.

The images can be found on The Angell Foundation's website. Note that these images do not appear on the website per se but can be found in the folders that form the website's underlying directory tree, along with other files and documents clearly not intended for public consumption.

Source: http://www.angellfoundation.org/uploads/image/founders%20photos/

The Images

Below are the original images, together with explanatory notes and enlargements highlighting the many peculiarities. Some of these images are very large, so I recommend that you save them to your PC and view them in the image editor of your choice.

David L. Angell with Kenneth A. Angell

This image of David with his brother, the bishop, is just terrible. Forget Photoshop, this looks like Amiga Deluxe Paint II territory. The face is visibly misaligned in parts and there's something very peculiar happening with David's glasses, in terms of sizing, the way they sit and the way the arms of his glasses appear to be 'drawn on'.

David Receives An Emmy

This picture of David receiving an Emmy Award is no better. Scroll all the way to the right, zoom in, then scroll down. Note that two sections of this image are slightly misaligned. Scroll to the right again and notice that these two misalignments just happen to coincide with where David face appears in the image. Note the strange cast and texture of David's face in comparison with the forehead and the misaligned strands of hair. Notice also that David's arm is raised in triumph yet his face is a devoid of any emotion whatsoever. His face looks like an artificially smooth expressionless mask because it IS quite literally an artificially smooth expressionless mask.

Lynn Angell at Hillsides

This picture of Lynn Angel reading to children at Hillsides is also very peculiar. Lynn is missing one half of her glasses. Where have we seen this before? What is Lynn sitting on in this picture? Also, notice that on the right hand side the balloon collage reaches all the way to the floor, whereas to the left (on the floor between Lynn and the book cart) we see a strange object with distinctly odd lighting. To my eye, this object looks like it belongs in a picture taken outdoors.

David Angell on "Cheers" Set

The full size picture of David on the Cheers set is just hilarious. Notice the crazy teeth, distorted jaw line, the very visible masking over his nose, the right ear that appears to be on a journey all of it's own, and the strange rectangular outline on the jacket of the woman just behind.

David and Lynn At Home

Similarly hilarious is the picture of David and Lynn 'at home'. Ignoring the obvious cardboard cutout appearances, it looks as if Lynn has just picked up David's severed left arm and is trying to hold it in place. David's watch strap looks a bit too tight as well: it appears to disappear into his wrist. Notice that Lynne's right ear is completely featureless and appears to be 'scraped back' from her face at a very odd angle. Notice also the disproportionate amount of red-eye: just a hint for David, whereas Lynne looks like The Terminator. One final point: is Lynn the only woman in the world who never alters her hairstyle?

Angell Foundation Brochure Image

This image appears in the official Angell Foundation brochure. It's supposed to be an identical, albeit highly saturated, version of an image that appears on the Angell Foundation's website. Notice that the backgrounds are different and that the eyes are very, very odd indeed.

David on "Frasier" Set

Here's David with some of the Frasier crew. Note that David is the only person in shade and observe the odd 'reflections' (or are we supposed to be 'looking through' the lens to the trees in the background?) and disjointed tinting in the right hand lens of his glasses, the way the upper part of his right eye socket (as seen in silhouette through the same lens) seems to curve away from his forehead, and the rather odd left ear.